Lexington Institute
1600 Wilson Boulevard
Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22209
Phone: 703-522-5828
Fax: 703-522-5837
mail@lexingtoninstitute.org
Homeland Security

Cost of Safety
Jul 21, 2003
Print friendly page
Email this article

Your July 7 lead editorial, "Measuring Safety," on setting standards for homeland security raised all the right questions, and began providing some good answers too. Earlier this year, the Lexington Institute undertook a study to rigorously assess the Bush administration's homeland security efforts to date. Based upon a review of government proposals and plans, we identified 12 functional areas whose aggregate represents the homeland security effort.

A team of 12 nationally recognized scholars was assembled to perform written assessments of the current state of each area. Their papers are published on our Web site at www.lexingtoninstitute.org/homeland/index.asp.

These participating experts included the former chief executive of El Al Airlines, a former U.N. chief nuclear weapons inspector, an author for the Hart/Rudman Commission's homeland security assessments and the former chief of the Domestic Counterterrorism Planning Section of the FBI.

The answer, as your editorial suggested, is mixed. But as Gordon England, the deputy secretary of homeland security, has pointed out, this problem will take decades of effort, not unlike the struggle against Soviet communism. It already has begun with a rigorous cost-benefit analysis that develops a sensible strategy to put resources and effort where they are needed most. It also begins with improved intelligence collection and analysis, and the creation of the Terrorist Threat Integration Center may be one of the most significant successes to date in securing the homeland.

The continental United States has not been attached since 9/11. Our military is on the other side of the world rounding up and killing terrorists, and already has overthrown two governments in response to the 2001 attack. In those same 21 months, the federal government has been reorganized to deal with this pernicious new threat.

It's pretty easy to be a critic booing from the bleachers with a make-believe, unlimited budget. It's a lot harder to actually get the job done, and thus far the results suggest a sense of urgency has captured the government, and progress is being made.


Top of Page
Copyright © Lexington Institute. All rights reserved.